Legal Opinion

Hendrix v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 22, 1979No. C.D. 4809; Court No. 76-12-02655PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FoRd, Judge;

In this action plaintiff contests the assessment of duty at 7.5 per centum ad valorem on certain marigold meal which was classified by the Customs Service as other animal feeds and ingredients therefor, not specially provided for, under item 184.75, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as modified by T.D. 68-9.

Plaintiff contends said merchandise is entitled to entry free of duty under the provision of item 470.80, Tariff Schedules of the United States, as crude or processed products of vegetable orgin used chiefly for coloring. Alternatively, plaintiff contends the imported…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trans-Atlantic Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  2. Garza v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. Semon Bache & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nestle Refrigerated Food Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API