Gentry v. Kelley Kar Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWood, P. J.
Plaintiffs Eugene and Ruth Gentry sought (1) damages for fraud in inducing them to execute a lease of an automobile, (2) damages for violation of section 2982, subdivision (a), of the Civil Code (failure to recite certain items in a conditional sale contract of an automobile, and failure to deliver a copy of the contract at the time of its execution), and (3) damages for a violation of section 2982, subdivision (c), of the Civil Code (limiting the amount of the time price differential under a conditional sale contract of an automobile). They also sought (1) to cancel the lease and a chattel…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kantlehner v. BiscegliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Pendell v. WarrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- The Merchant of Tennis v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2026
- The Merchant of Tennis, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
- The Merchant of Tennis, Inc. v. Superior Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2026