Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Palmer

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 6, 2007No. 1 CA-CV 06-0674PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 After the dissolution of a marriage, a person’s obligation to pay future maintenance to a former spouse terminates upon the death of either party or upon the remarriage of the party receiving maintenance, unless the decree of dissolution expressly provides to the contrary or the parties have otherwise agreed in writing. Ariz.Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § 25-327(B) (2007). In this appeal we decide whether a decree of dissolution “expressly” provides that the former husband’s spousal maintenance obligation will continue beyond the remarriage of the former wife.

¶ 2…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Urias v. PCS Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. Maycock v. Asilomar Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. Burke v. Voicestream Wireless Corp. IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. In Re the Marriage of ZaleArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Johnson v. Hispanic Broadcasters of Tucson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. Gonzalez-Gunter v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  3. In re Marriage of CerroneColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Danko v. DankoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  5. Johnson v. GravinoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API