Legal Opinion

Spooner v. Town of Topsham

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 7, 2007No. 06-208PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.

¶ 1. The question presented is whether, under the qualified privilege for reporters first recognized by this Court in State v. St. Peter, 132 Vt. 266, 315 A.2d 254 (1974), a newspaper reporter may properly refuse to testify as to events he witnessed at a public selectboard hearing where such events, though observed by others, are relevant to significant issues in a pending civil lawsuit. We hold that, on the facts presented, the reporter here was not entitled to withhold his testimony. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court judgment, and remand for further proceedings.

¶ 2. The material facts…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. United States v. James Burke, Anthony Perla, Rocco Perla, and Richard KuhnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Mark v. Shoen v. Leonard Samuel Shoen, Edward J. Shoen v. Leonard Samuel Shoen, Ronald J. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. O'Neill v. Oakgrove Construction, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spooner v. Town of TopshamSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API