People v. Robbins
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
In face of the offer of defense counsel to stipulate that the photographs identified by the victim before trial had indeed been photographs of defendant, it was error to admit the police mug shots in question notwithstanding that some effort had been made by pasteovers to modify their appearance. Prejudice to defendant’s constitutional rights was inescapable (cf. United States v Harrington, 490 F2d 487).
We cannot agree on this record that such error was harmless under any of the tests for such error…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by10 opinions
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- People v. De Los AngelesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. BlanchardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.