Application of Northwestern Bell Telephone
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
These appeals question whether the Public Utilities Commission properly denied costs to several intervenors in a telephone rate case because their participation had not “materially assisted” the Commission in its deliberations. The court of appeals, in a split decision, reversed the denial and remanded to the Commission to formulate appropriate standards and make adequate findings. We affirm in part and reverse in part the court of appeals’ decision.
In the fall of 1983 Northwestern Bell Telephone Company filed a petition for a general rate increase. The matter was set for a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Manufactured Housing Institute v. PettersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ganguli v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Carter v. Olmsted County HousingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- In Re the License Application of Rochester Ambulance ServiceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 14 v. County of RamseyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994