Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Feeter

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 23, 1867PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from, Scott District Court. Suit in equity, to redeem from a sale under a trust-deed, and also from a decree of mortgage foreclosure upon the same real estate. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

*548i. appeai. : when not allowed. *547I. The cause, by consent of parties, was tried before a referee, who heard the evidence and *548reported it, with the facts found, together with . ’. ’ ° his conclusions oi law thereon, to the court. The plaintiff took no exceptions before the referee, and in the District Court moved for the confirmation of his report and for judgment accordingly thereon. This motion was sustained and judgment rendered, allowing plaintiff to redeem upon certain specified terms as reported by the referee, and no exception was taken by the plaintiff. Some time after the judgment was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wickersham v. ReevesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dorr Cattle Co. v. Des Moines National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Eiceman v. FinchIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Farmers Trust & Savings Bank v. ManningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. Teabout v. Jaffray & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. Omaha Fire Insurance v. Maxwell, Sharp & Ross Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API