Legal Opinion

Omaha Fire Insurance v. Maxwell, Sharp & Ross Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1893No. 5989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the district court of Madison county. Tried below before Powers, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNokval, J.

This action was instituted by defendant in error, a corporation, on a policy of insurance. A' verdict was returned for the plaintiff, upon which a judgment was rendered, and on February 11, 1892, the insurance company brought the cause to this court for review by petition in error. Defendant in error has filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the motion for a new trial in the court below was overruled, and final judgment was entered in the cause by consent of parties. This motion comes too late. .Rule 8 of this court provides that “neither motions to dismiss, unless for want of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lee v. HassettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Chapin v. PerrinMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Brick v. BrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Hughes v. FeeterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  5. Jackson v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pahl v. SpragueNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Norwegian Plow Co. v. BollmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Rockford Insurance v. Maxwell, Sharp & Ross Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API