Omaha Fire Insurance v. Maxwell, Sharp & Ross Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Madison county. Tried below before Powers, J.
1Opinion of the CourtNokval, J.
This action was instituted by defendant in error, a corporation, on a policy of insurance. A' verdict was returned for the plaintiff, upon which a judgment was rendered, and on February 11, 1892, the insurance company brought the cause to this court for review by petition in error. Defendant in error has filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the motion for a new trial in the court below was overruled, and final judgment was entered in the cause by consent of parties. This motion comes too late. .Rule 8 of this court provides that “neither motions to dismiss, unless for want of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lee v. HassettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
- Chapin v. PerrinMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Brick v. BrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Hughes v. FeeterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Jackson v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pahl v. SpragueNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Norwegian Plow Co. v. BollmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Rockford Insurance v. Maxwell, Sharp & Ross Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1893