Bradshaw v. Duluth Imperial Mill Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff, John W. Bradshaw, from a judgment of the District Court of St. Louis County, Baxter, J., entered September 22, 1892. Orrin W. Eice received a patent from the United States for the peninsula now known as Eice’s Point in Duluth harbor. On De•cember 31, 1858, he filed in the Eegistryof Deeds in St Louis county ■a plat of the property.
Read the full summary
Appeal by plaintiff, John W. Bradshaw, from a judgment of the District Court of St. Louis County, Baxter, J., entered September 22, 1892. Orrin W. Eice received a patent from the United States for the peninsula now known as Eice’s Point in Duluth harbor. On De•cember 31, 1858, he filed in the Eegistryof Deeds in St Louis county ■a plat of the property. The land was low and the waters around it •shallow, and he platted the land including that covered by the shallow water for a considerable distance beyond the shore. In 1859, Eice sold to one Panzi twelve lots in block one hundred and…
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The only question presented by this appeal is-whether the conclusions of law were justified by the findings of fact. These facts, so far as here material, are that one Orrin W. Rice, being the owner of a peninsula, the whole easterly side of which is-washed -by the waters of the bay of Duluth, in December, 1858, .executed and filed a town plat thereof under the name of “Rice’s Point.”' This platting extended a long distance out into the waters of the bay,, dividing it into blocks, streets, and avenues in conformity to the platting on dry land. Block eighty-two, (82,) as shown on the plat,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hanford v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Union Depot, Street Railway & Transfer Co. v. BrunswickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Brisbine v. St. Paul & Sioux City RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Watson v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Miller v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- State v. KorrerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Falconer v. SimmonsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
- Pike Rapids Power Co. v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- First Construction Co. v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.