Lena Harkins and Adam Harkins, for Themselves and for All Those Members of the Five Civilized Tribes Similarly Situated v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DELMAS C. HILL, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs, restricted Choctaw Indians, filed this class action for themselves and all other members of the Five Civilized Tribes similarly situated. They alleged that certain income taxes were assessed against them by the United States and paid by the government’s representatives out of trust funds maintained by the Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Indian affairs for the restricted Indians; that these taxes were paid on income received from oil and gas lease bonuses executed on restricted, allotted lands; that it is “probable” that payment of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Arenas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Anglin & StevensonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- United States v. HellardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. PrestonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Victor Fontenelle v. Omaha Tribe of Nebraska, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Lee Motah and Horace Noyabad v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Mitchell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Affiliated UTE Citizens of Utah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.