Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Menzies
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 30, 1956No. 36, 37, 38PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
The principal question involved in these three cases is whether the Federal Trade Commission has the power to issue subpoenas duces tecum in proceedings before the Commission based upon alleged violations of subsection (d) of sec. 2 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 730, as amended by the Robinsom-Patman Act, 49 Stat. 1526, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13.
The Proceedings.
In November, 1955, the Commission issued three complaints, against Crosse & Blackwell Company, McCormick & Company, Inc., and Pompeian Olive Oil Corporation, respectively, each of which charged the respondent with price…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Federal Trade Commission v. W. W. Tuttle, Resident Manager, Ernst & ErnstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Federal Trade Commission v. J. E. Lonning, President, and Kellogg Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- File Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Consumers Union of the United States, Inc. And Public Citizen's Health Research Group v. Consumer Product Safety CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.