Legal Opinion
Navajo Nation v. Norris
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided November 12, 1999No. CY-98-3001-EFSPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS NORRIS’ MOTION FOR EXPEDITED HEARING AND DENYING DEFENDANTS NORRIS’ MOTION TO STRIKE RULE 26 DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES
SHEA, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendants James and Gayle Norris’ Motion for an Expedited Hearing Pursuant to LR 7.1(h)(6) (Ct. Rec. 168) and Motion to Strike Plaintiff-Intervenor’s Rule 26 Disclosure of Expert Witnesses and to Bar Plaintiff-Intervenor’s Experts from Testifying (Ct. Rec. 169). The Court has reviewed the motions and supporting documents.
A. BACKGROUND
The Scheduling Order (Ct. Rec. 95) entered for this matter on May 5,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Signtech USA, Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
3Cited by9 opinions
- McCulloch v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Bekaert Corp. v. City of DyersburgDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2009
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Railway Express, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- KW Plastics v. United States Can Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
- Duluth Lighthouse for the Blind v. C.G. Bretting Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.