Bekaert Corp. v. City of Dyersburg
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT DESIGNATION OF MICHAEL HYNES
S. THOMAS ANDERSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Bekaert Corporation’s (“Bekaert”) Motion to Strike the Expert Designation of Michael Hynes (D.E.#85). Defendant City of Dyersburg (“Dyersburg”) has since responded (D.E.# 91). A hearing on the Motion was held January 20, 2009, at which time Dyers-burg was granted leave to file a supplemental response (D.E.# 116). For the reasons set for below, Plaintiffs Motion to Strike the Expert Designation of Michael Hynes is hereby GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
The City of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Margaret Woods v. Robert LecureuxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Jesse A. Fielden v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Florentino Prieto v. Manuel MalgorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Wreath v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Cohlmia v. Ardent Health Services, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Numatics, Inc. v. Balluff, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Valley View Development, Inc. v. United States Ex Rel. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2010
- Arends v. Family Solutions of Ohio, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- Beijing Meishe Network Technology Co., Ltd. v. TikTok Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Best Process Solutions, Inc. v. Blue Phoenix Inashco USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.