Legal Opinion

Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Signtech USA, Ltd.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 22, 1998No. Civ. No. 4-96-1262PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LEBEDOFF, United States Magistrate Judge.

The above-entitled matter came on for hearing before the undersigned Magistrate Judge of District Court on November 18, 1997, on a motion by Defendant Signtech USA, Ltd. (Signtech) to compel discovery and extend the periods for expert rebuttal reports and discovery. The discovery Sign-tech seeks is Plaintiff Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company’s (3M) expert reports under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(B), for the expert witnesses identified in 3M’s Rule 26(a)(2)(A) Expert Witness Disclosures.

3M has refused to impose the written report requirement on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. Sullivan v. Glock, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1997

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Florentino Prieto v. Manuel MalgorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Railway Express, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  3. KW Plastics v. United States Can Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
  4. Dyson Technology Ltd. v. Maytag Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
  5. Plastics v. United States Can Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API