Legal Opinion
United States v. Jackson
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 29, 2008No. 06-3848, 06-4124, 06-4399PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TINDER, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Angela Hubbard, Ieanis Shaw, Eddie Jackson, Pamela Young, and Bruce Jones were charged in a three-count indictment with bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1344 and 2. The government alleged that Ms. Shaw and Ms. Hubbard generated false mortgage loan documents in order to wire transfer mortgage loan proceeds to the personal bank accounts of Mends and family. One count was dismissed against Ms. Shaw, and a superseding indictment was returned, adding money laundering charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1957 against all defendants except Mr. Jones.
Defendants Shaw,…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- United States v. RecendizCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Anthony VolpendestoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. John NataleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. HatfieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.