Legal Opinion

United States v. Anthony Volpendesto

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 24, 2014No. 11-3022, 12-1180, 12-1656PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted Anthony Volpendesto, Mark Polchan, and Michael Sarno of numerous offenses — principally racketeering conspiracy, but also conducting an illegal gambling business, conspiracy to damage property by means of an explosive device, and conspiracy to obstruct justice, among others. They now challenge their convictions and sentences.

I. Background

This case involves a criminal enterprise operating in and around Cicero, Illinois. Through a business called Amusements Inc., the enterprise distributed “video gambling devices” to local bars and restaurants. These…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. United States v. Earl WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Domanus v. Locke Lord LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Terrance P. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. James Michael FarrellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  5. State v. BetancourtSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API