Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Garlock, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 29, 1998No. 94 CIV. 4397(RWS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Atlas Turner Inc. (“Atlas”) has brought a trio of post-trial motions in response to a jury verdict entered in favor of plaintiff Linda Hamilton (“Plaintiff’) in an asbestos action. First, Atlas has moved for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or in the alterative for a new trial pursuant to Rule 59(a). Second, Atlas seeks reconsideration of this Court’s November 5, 1998 order that set aside the jury verdict regarding the issue of allocation of fault. Finally, Atlas has renewed its motion pursuant…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Kreutter v. McFadden Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Linda Hamilton, Individually and as of the Estate of George Hamilton v. Atlas Turner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Thackurdeen v. Duke Univ.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Transpacific Corp. (In Re Commodore International, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- LaBarbera v. Audax Construction Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Hamilton v. Garlock, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000