Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Garlock, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 18, 2000No. 94 CIV. 4397(RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The defendant Atlas Turner, Inc. (“Atlas Turner”) has moved pursuant to Rules 50 and 59, Fed.R.Civ.P., to set aside the verdict rendered against it or for a new trial. Plaintiff Linda Hamilton, individually and as executrix of the estate of George Hamilton (“Hamilton”) seeks certain discovery and the entry of judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the motion of Atlas Turner is denied, and the motions of Hamilton are granted.
Prior Proceedings
This is the epilogue to a hard-fought litigation brought by Hamilton to recover damages against, among other defendants,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lightfoot v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Cover v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Linda Hamilton, Individually and as of the Estate of George Hamilton v. Atlas Turner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Gonzalez v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hamilton v. Garlock, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- D'Ulisse v. Amchen Products, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2007