Legal Opinion

People v. Kindra

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1894PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from the superior court of Grand Rapids. (Burlingame, J.) Respondent was convicted of keeping his saloon open after hours. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Lon», J.

The respondent was arrested and tried before the superior court of Grand Rapids for keeping his saloon open on the night of August 24, 1893. At the time in question, the respondent was running an hotel and saloon in the city of Grand Rapids; and, on the evening of that day, a dance 'was in progress in the hall upstairs, in the same building. The dance was concluded about 11 o’clock. On the part of the prosecution, it is claimed that, after the' dance, the witnesses Stoutjesdyk, Price, and Rittenberg, together with Lou Thayer and her sister and one May Wyman and several others, came…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hurd v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Bonker v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. People v. QuickMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. KayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. People v. HarrisonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. State v. BlockerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. People v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. People v. DickinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API