People v. Kindra
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from the superior court of Grand Rapids. (Burlingame, J.) Respondent was convicted of keeping his saloon open after hours. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Lon», J.
The respondent was arrested and tried before the superior court of Grand Rapids for keeping his saloon open on the night of August 24, 1893. At the time in question, the respondent was running an hotel and saloon in the city of Grand Rapids; and, on the evening of that day, a dance 'was in progress in the hall upstairs, in the same building. The dance was concluded about 11 o’clock. On the part of the prosecution, it is claimed that, after the' dance, the witnesses Stoutjesdyk, Price, and Rittenberg, together with Lou Thayer and her sister and one May Wyman and several others, came…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hurd v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Bonker v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- People v. QuickMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. KayneMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- People v. HarrisonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. BlockerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- People v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- People v. DickinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.