Legal Opinion

People v. Quick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1884PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Oakland. (Stickney, J.) LaeoeNY. Respondent was convicted.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The defendant in this case was a witness on bis own behalf. The charge was of larceny of a watch. The defendant did not deny taking the watch, and the question at issue was the felonious intent. The defendant had picked up the owner of the watch from the ground in the public street where, as he testified, he was lying partly on his face. He raised him up and tried to have him stand on his feet. He was then asked by his counsel “ Why did you do that ? ” This was objected to “ as permitting the defendant to make his own defence,” and ruled out. This was error. The purpose in…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. SimmonsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Selph v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
  3. People v. WhittemoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. People v. KindraMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Pueblo v. RománSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API