Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Gerstenfeld

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1990No. 89-716PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Associate Judge:

This appeal is before us for consideration of motions for summary affirmance and summary reversal. The Rental Housing Conversion and Sale Act, D.C.Code §§ 45-1601 — 1663 (1990) affords tenants an opportunity to purchase the housing accommodation in which they live when the owner decides to sell it. The underlying Superior Court action was but one of several in which appellant Stanton has contested vari ous aspects of the sale of the apartment building in which he has resided. This appeal was taken by Stanton from the order of the Superior Court dismissing his action…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. DeLevay v. District of Columbia Rental Accommodations CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Patsy Paris v. United States Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Massengale v. CafritzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. West End Tenants Ass'n v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Richman Towers Tenants'ass'n, Inc. v. Richman Towers LLC.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Twin Towers Plaza Tenants Ass'n v. Capitol Park Associates, L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Redmond v. BirkelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
  5. Redmond v. BirkelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API