Legal Opinion
Redmond v. Birkel
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 18, 1992No. Civ. A. 88-133 SSHPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
Now before the Court are the motions for summary judgment by plaintiffs 1 Ber tha Redmond, Lucy Redmond, Ernestine Williams and Linda Allsop, against defendants Ralph A. and Mary M. Birkel and William J. and Mary C. Bailey. On consideration of the entire record, the Court grants plaintiffs’ motions in part, and denies them in part. 2
BACKGROUND
This suit originated on January 21, 1988, when plaintiffs filed a complaint against defendants Birkel and Bailey based upon defendants’ alleged violation of the Rental Housing Conversion and Sale Act (“the Act” or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stanton v. GerstenfeldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Massengale v. CafritzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richman Towers Tenants'ass'n, Inc. v. Richman Towers LLC.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Zanders v. ReidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Twin Towers Plaza Tenants Ass'n v. Capitol Park Associates, L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Redmond v. BirkelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996