Legal Opinion

Redmond v. Birkel

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 2, 1996No. Civil Action CA 88-133PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

Before the Court are the Birkel defendants’ motion for summary judgment on Counts II and III of plaintiffs amended complaint, plaintiffs opposition thereto, and defendants’ reply. 1 Upon careful consideration of the entire record, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted.

Background

The Court briefly discusses the long history of this action. Plaintiff Bertha Redmond, the sole remaining plaintiff in this action, and three other plaintiffs (plaintiffs Lucy Redmond, Linda Allsop, and Ernestine Williams) filed a lawsuit against defendants William…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Tao v. FreehCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  4. Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Wiggins v. District Cablevision, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Ex Rel. Landis v. Tailwind Sports Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API