Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Esch v. Forster

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 2, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

A special taxing district known as “Daytona and New Smyrna Inlet District,” to embrace the territory within the territorial boundaries of County Commissioners’ Districts numbered Four and Five, was created by a special act of the Legislature in 1925. See Chapter 10448 Laws of Florida, Special Acts 1925.

The governing body of the District consisted of three persons who were to be elected and such governing body was known as the “Board of Commissioners” of the District by name. The Board was authorized to improve and construct a waterway connecting the waters of the Halifax and Indian Rivers…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crawford v. GilchristSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  2. Merchants' National Bank v. GrunthalSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  3. Stewart v. Daytona & New Smyrna Inlet DistrictSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. Williams v. PittSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  5. Morgan v. EatonSupreme Court of Florida · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bay View Estates Corp. v. SoutherlandSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. State v. LottSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. Phillips v. Lindsay Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. Forster v. EschSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. Williams v. DunnSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API