Legal Opinion

Williams v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 19, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

After the appeal taken herein was quashed under the statute (141 So.2d 190) a reargument on the merits was ordered and had.

Where opposing counsel accepts due notice of final hearing of a chancery cause, the mere failure of the moving counsel to make entry in the order book that the case is "set down for a hearing," under Rule 86, will not render a decree erroneous, where counsel who accepted notice of the hearing appeared at the hearing and objected to the entry of a decree only because the case was not "set down for a hearing" in the chancery order book. When the court overrules such an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blount Bros. Realty Co. v. EilenbergerSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  2. Griffin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Roberts Bros. v. LangfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. Esch v. ForsterSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Williams v. DunnSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Buchanan & Crowder, Inc. v. KreamerSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API