Legal Opinion

Forster v. Esch

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 29, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

A supplemental amended bill was filed in this case November 12, 1930. The original bill was filed in March, 1928, and in July of that year a second amended bill was filed. The relief which these various bills sought and the theory upon which they rested are sufficiently set out and discussed in the cases of Esch v. Forster, 99 Fla. 717, 127 South. Rep. 336, and New Smyrna Inlet Dist. v. Esch, 103 Fla. 24, 137 South. Rep. 1, rehearing in the latter case was denied, 103 Fla. 31, 138 South. Rep. 49.

Testimony was eventually taken under the original and, second amended bills and answers interposed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New Smyrna Inlet District v. EschSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Stewart v. Daytona & New Smyrna Inlet DistrictSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  3. Stewart v. New Smyrna Inlet DistrictSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. Esch v. ForsterSupreme Court of Florida · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miami Bridge Co. v. Miami Beach Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. Gulf Life Insurance v. Hillsborough CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. Esch v. ForsterSupreme Court of Florida · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API