Legal Opinion
Owensboro on the Air, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 18, 1958No. Nos. 13776, 13777, 14044, 14046, 14047, 14049PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANAHER, Circuit Judge.
We are here asked to review another phase of the vexatious UHF-VHF conflict v/hich has long engaged the Commission and which on several occasions has come to this court.1 *This time we are concerned with Evansville, Indiana, and the area adjacent thereto.
Owensboro on the Air, Inc. and Owensboro Publishing Company had been engaged in adjudicatory proceedings testing their comparative qualifications for an award of VHF Channel 9 in Hatfield, Indiana.2 The Commission had made no award. These parties will hereinafter be referred to as Owensboro-appellants. Evansville…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hotch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Logansport Broadcasting Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Coastal Bend Television Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Gulf Coast Broadcasting Company, Intervenor. Coastal Bend Television Company v. The United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Gulf Coast Broadcasting Company, Intervenor. Monona Broadcasting Company, Bartell Television Corporation v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Radio Wisconsin, Incorporated, Winnebago Television Corporation, Intervenors. Monona Broadcasting Company, Bartell Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Radio Wisconsin, Incorporated, Winnebago Television Corporation, Intervenors. Premier Television, Inc., Ohio Valley Television Company v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Premier Television, Inc., Ohio Valley Television Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Mid-America Broadcasting Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Mid-America Broadcasting Corporation v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Van Curler Broadcasting Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Van Curler Broadcasting Corporation v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Hudson Valley Broadcasting Company, Inc., Intervenor. Greylock Broadcasting Company v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Hudson Valley Broadcasting Company, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- International Harvester Co. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- McLouth Steel Products Corporation v. Lee M. Thomas, Administrator, and U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Community Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Modern Broadcasting Company of Baton Rouge, Inc., Intervenor. Community Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Modern Broadcasting Company of Baton Rouge, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Buckeye Cablevision, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.