Legal Opinion
Van Curler Broadcasting Corp. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 9, 1956No. Nos. 12987, 12989PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.
This matter is closely akin to the cases known here as the Coastal Bend cases,1 decided June 7, 1956. The factual background recited in the opinion in those cases need not be repeated here. There is a difference. In those cases the petitioners-appellants were UHF licensees complaining of pending grants of VHF licenses in their areas. In the present cases the petitioners, also UHF licensees, are complaining of the allocation of a VHF channel (Channel 10) to a community in their area. The Coastal Bend cases concerned licenses; the present cases concern a channel…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Coastal Bend Television Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Gulf Coast Broadcasting Company, Intervenor. Coastal Bend Television Company v. The United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Gulf Coast Broadcasting Company, Intervenor. Monona Broadcasting Company, Bartell Television Corporation v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Radio Wisconsin, Incorporated, Winnebago Television Corporation, Intervenors. Monona Broadcasting Company, Bartell Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Radio Wisconsin, Incorporated, Winnebago Television Corporation, Intervenors. Premier Television, Inc., Ohio Valley Television Company v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Premier Television, Inc., Ohio Valley Television Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Mid-America Broadcasting Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Mid-America Broadcasting Corporation v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Greylock Broadcasting Company v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Hudson Valley Broadcasting Company, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
3Cited by28 opinions
- Automotive Parts & Accessories Ass'n v. BoydCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Sangamon Valley Television Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Sangamon Valley Television Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Action for Children's Television v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.