Legal Opinion
Van Curler Broadcasting Corporation v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Hudson Valley Broadcasting Company, Inc., Intervenor. Greylock Broadcasting Company v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Hudson Valley Broadcasting Company, Inc., Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 9, 1956No. 12989_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
236 F.2d 727
98 U.S.App.D.C. 432
VAN CURLER BROADCASTING CORPORATION, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and Federal Communications
Commission, Respondents, Hudson Valley
Broadcasting Company, Inc., Intervenor.
GREYLOCK BROADCASTING COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America and Federal Communications
Commission, Respondents, Hudson Valley
Broadcasting Company, Inc., Intervenor.
Nos. 12987, 12989.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued April 20, 1956.
Decided July 9, 1956.
[98 U.S.App.D.C. 433] Mr. Harry M. Plotkin, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Paul A. Porter,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ashbacker Radio Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Logansport Broadcasting Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Coastal Bend Television Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Gulf Coast Broadcasting Company, Intervenor. Coastal Bend Television Company v. The United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Gulf Coast Broadcasting Company, Intervenor. Monona Broadcasting Company, Bartell Television Corporation v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Radio Wisconsin, Incorporated, Winnebago Television Corporation, Intervenors. Monona Broadcasting Company, Bartell Television Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Radio Wisconsin, Incorporated, Winnebago Television Corporation, Intervenors. Premier Television, Inc., Ohio Valley Television Company v. United States of America, Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Premier Television, Inc., Ohio Valley Television Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Mid-America Broadcasting Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., Intervenor. Mid-America Broadcasting Corporation v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Evansville Television, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Van Curler Broadcasting Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Peoples Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Automotive Parts & Accessories Ass'n v. BoydCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Sangamon Valley Television Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Sangamon Valley Television Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Action for Children's Television v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Automotive Parts & Accessories Association, Inc. v. Alan S. Boyd, Secretary of the Department of Transportation, Automotive Service Industry Association, Intervenor. Sterling Products Company, Inc. v. Alan S. Boyd, Secretary of the Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.