Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Canino

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 11, 1928No. 12,110PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

Villa Crosby sued T. Canino and Walter G. Lett for damages for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. Tbe court granted the defendants’ motion for a nonsuit, holding that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence.

The parties join in requesting that a final decision be rendered on the application for a supersedeas.

As on motion for a nonsuit, so in the present proceeding, the evidence is to-be viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of all inferences in her favor that may reasonably be drawn from the evidence.

On April…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harris v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. RyanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  3. Mickelson v. FischerWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Hedges v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  5. Cool v. PetersenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Moran v. GatzIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Interstate Motor Lines, Inc. v. Great Western Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  3. Eddy v. McAninchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Stahl v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  5. Bullock v. WayneDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API