Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Gray

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 18, 1913PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Bill in equity, filed in the Supreme Judicial Court, as amended, on January 6, 1912, against the former and present members of a partnership carrying on business under the name of Gray and Davis, setting forth a contract in writing dated January 6, 1909, which is described in the opinion, made by the defendants Gray and Hollander with Charles G. Wridgway, who assigned his rights thereunder to the Wridgway No-Glare Shade Company which assigned its rights to the plaintiff, and…

Read the full summary

Bill in equity, filed in the Supreme Judicial Court, as amended, on January 6, 1912, against the former and present members of a partnership carrying on business under the name of Gray and Davis, setting forth a contract in writing dated January 6, 1909, which is described in the opinion, made by the defendants Gray and Hollander with Charles G. Wridgway, who assigned his rights thereunder to the Wridgway No-Glare Shade Company which assigned its rights to the plaintiff, and seeking to establish a debt from the defendants Gray and Hollander to the plaintiff of a balance of $475 and to reach…

1Opinion of the CourtDe Courcy, J.

The plaintiff’s right to recover depends upon the construction of a written agreement between Charles G. Wridgway, to whose interest he succeeds by assignment, and the defendants Gray and Hollander, formerly copartners under the name of Gray and Davis, and hereinafter called the defendants.

Wridgway was the owner of certain letters patent for a lamp shade for road vehicles. By the agreement in question he licensed the defendants to manufacture the shades for the period of one year; and further agreed not to permit any other lamp manufacturer in the United States to make them during the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guerin v. StacyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. Garst v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  3. Morrison v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lynch v. AndrewMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  2. Rice v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. TAL Financial Corp. v. CSC Consulting, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. Cummings Properties, LLC v. National Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  5. Factory Realty Corp. v. Corbin-Holmes Shoe Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API