Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Doll

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 9, 1931No. 28,502PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment against him for $4,416.13.

Action to recover for personal injury and property damage resulting from a collision between plaintiff’s automobile and that of defendant. At the conclusion of the testimony defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was denied. His subsequent motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial was also denied.

Trunk highway No. 46 is in part a concrete pavement 18 feet wide, running east and west through the village of Chisago City. The accident occurred on the outskirts of the village on July 1, 1929, at about seven…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Klare v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Akerson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Clark v. WeathersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Douglas v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Schrader v. KrieselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Cooper v. HoeglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  4. Eklund v. KapetasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Bruce MacGibbon and Tina MacGibbon v. Godfrey Smalls and Warren EmanuelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API