State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Vails
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWYN, Justice.
This is an appeal by the complainant insurance company (State Farm) from a final decree in a declaratory judgment proceeding determining coverage under an automobile liability insurance policy issued by State Farm.
Two questions are presented, viz: Whether the trial court correctly held (1) that there was coverage and (2) that State Farm should pay attorneys’ fees to the solicitors of two of the respondents in the declaratory judgment proceeding.
The named insured, M. J. Meaney, operates a flower shop in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, which adjoins his home. He employed William Henry…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Alabama Power Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Birmingham Post Co. v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Moore-Handley Hardware Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Tuscaloosa Veneer Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ware v. TimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Public Entity Pool for Liability v. ScoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Canal Insurance v. EarnshawDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1985
- Defoor v. EvesqueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- RAST CONST., INC. v. PetersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.