Legal Opinion

Defoor v. Evesque

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 2, 1997No. 1951176PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Frank Defoor, slipped and fell at Bessemer State Technical College ("Bessemer Tech"), while taking a hydraulics test to qualify for employment with USX Corporation ("USX"). He filed negligence claims against James Evesque, the Bessemer Tech employee who administered the test, alleging that there was spilled hydraulic fluid at the test site and that Evesque's failure to clean up the fluid had caused Defoor to slip and fall, and against USX, on the theory that Evesque was the "borrowed servant" of USX. The trial court entered a summary judgment for USX and Evesque, holding that…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nance by and Through Nance v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Phillips v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Wilma Corp. v. Fleming Foods of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Barnes v. DaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. DeStafney v. University of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Ex Parte Tuscaloosa CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Ware v. TimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. Flowers v. PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  5. Ex Parte KelleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API