Legal Opinion

Granette Products Co. v. Arthur H. Neumann & Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 12, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVermilion, J.

I. The amended and substituted petition alleged that the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract whereby the plaintiff undertook to manufacture and deliver to the defendant certain artificial architectural stone, to be used by defendant in the construction of a school building at Council Bluffs. It alleged that the greater part of the stone was delivered, and that the defendant refused to accept further stone, and elected to rescind the contract. The contract is set out. In the contract the plaintiff is designated as the subcontractor, and the defendant as the contractor, and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cook v. FoleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Gray v. CottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. Frum v. KeeneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  5. Lake v. Western Silo Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  2. LaFontaine v. Developers & Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  3. L. H. Heiselt, Inc. v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  4. Waldman Produce, Inc. v. Frigidaire Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1935
  5. Kunde v. O'BrianSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API