Legal Opinion
Cook v. Foley
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 13, 1907No. 2,224PublishedCited by 33 opinions
In Error-to-the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. ,
1Opinion of the Court
POLLOCK, District Judge.
The important and controlling facts in this case, as gleaned from the record, are:
Defendants in error (hereinafter called “defendants”) were the original contractors with the Algoma Central Railway Company (hereinafter called the “railway company”) for the grading of a line of road in Canada. On the 30th day of September, 1901,, the defendants received from plaintiffs in error (hereinafter called “plaintiffs”), the following proposition to grade a portion of the road.
“St. Paul, Sept. 30, 1901.
“Messrs. Foley Bros., Porters & Whalen, Contractors.
“Gentlemen: We propose to…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Scott v. NeelySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Chicago v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Midway Northern Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1916
- McCullough v. Clinch-Mitchell Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Robinson v. Denver City Tramway Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- George v. WisemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Silverman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.