Legal Opinion

People v. Randolph

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1933No. Docket No. 2831PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

Appellant was accused by the district attorney of Los Angeles County, in an information consisting of two counts, of burglary. The first count alleged that appellant entered the office of Dr. H. B. Griffin, located at 5107 Hollywood Boulevard, with intent to commit theft. The count also charged three prior convictions. The second count contained a similar allegation on the same day, in entering the offices of Dr. Donald W. Wilkins, located at 4471 Sunset Boulevard. By another information appellant was charged with a violation of the state Narcotic and Drug Act, on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HurleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. People v. Le BaronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. State v. FlintUtah Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. GoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. CarrascoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API