Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Flint

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1928No. 4376PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKER, District Judge.

Defendant was found guilty by a jury of the crime of being a persistent violator of title 54, Compiled Laws of Utah, 1917, and acts amendatory thereof, or of what is commonly known as the Prohibition Act. He was thereafter sentenced to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the Utah State Prison, as provided by law. This appeal is prosecuted to reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Comp. Laws Utah, 1917, § 3343, and section 3345, as amended by chapter 66, Laws Utah, 1919, as amended by chapter 10,- Laws Utah, 1925, so far as material here, provide:

“Except as…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Ammons v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Chicco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
  3. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. City of Jackson v. GordonMississippi Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State v. CoxOregon Supreme Court · 1919

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. GoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. BRACCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. People v. BrothertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. People v. MandellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API