Legal Opinion

People v. Hurley

California Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1882No. 10,682PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of conviction, and from an order denying a new trial in the Superior Court of Humboldt County. Haynes, J. No briefs on file.

1Opinion of the Court

Sharpstein, J.:

The fact that the hides of the cattle alleged to have been stolen were found in the defendant’s barn, is not controverted. And we think that they were found there within a sufficiently recent period, after the loss of the cattle, to answer the requirements of the law in that respect.

But that is not all that is required to warrant the inference that the defendant stole the property. To justify that inference it must further appear that the possession was personal, • and that it involved a distinct and conscious assertion of possession by him. And even then such possession may be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. NoregeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Davis v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. State v. SullivanIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Grantello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. Sorenson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  5. State v. DrewSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API