Legal Opinion

Greer v. Professional Fiduciary, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 4, 2011No. A10-716PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

Appellant, a formerly incapacitated person, challenges the actions taken by respondents, who are her former conservator, her former guardian, and her former guardian’s counsel, while she was under the jurisdiction of the probate court. The district court dismissed appellant’s claims against respondent-conservator and respondent-guardian to the extent they were based on actions taken during the probate-court proceedings. The district court also entered judgment on the pleadings in favor of respondent-guardian’s counsel because appellant failed to articulate a viable theory…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Matter of Conservatorship of TorresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tozzi v. MoffettWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Doe 175 ex rel. Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School District, ISD No. 13Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Aaron Carlson Corp. v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API