Legal Opinion
In re the Assignment of Bicknell
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Pbooeediug for final accounting and distribution.
1Opinion of the CourtFobbes, J.
This proceeding was instituted, by the assignee, for a final accounting and distribution of the assets in his hands, under an assignment for the benefit of creditors, and for the passing of his accounts for commissions,, expenses and money advanced for attorney and counsel fees.
The inventory, filed with the county judge of Madison county, shows that the actual value of the assets coming into the hands of the assignee was about $3,500. Their nominal value was something over $4,000.
The Rational Bank of Waterville is a creditor to the extent of $4,016, based on ten promissory notes, held by said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Randall v. . PackardNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of RutledgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- People v. Bond Street Savings BankNew York Supreme Court · 1881
- In re Sawyer, Wallace & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- In re the Final Accounting of LittleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- Merchants National Bank v. FlippenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- In re the Final Accounting of HayesNew York Supreme Court · 1902