City of Lancaster v. Broaddus
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Garrard Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Carroll —
Affirming.
Hubert Broaddus, a young boy, received serious injuries when an automobile in which he was riding in company with other people on one of the streets of the city of Lancaster turned over, and in a suit to recover damages there was a judgment in his favor and the city appeals.
The machine in which the boy was riding was being driven by Joe Turner, an experienced and careful driver. When the machine was going at a speed of about ten miles an hour — not exceeding twelve — Turner discovered an approaching wagon and for the purpose of avoiding…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Carlin v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Biggs v. HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
- James v. Trustees of Wellston TownshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- McArthur v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Warner v. Inhabitants of HolyokeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Alderson v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Dillingham v. Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
- Central City v. SnodgrassCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- City of Louisville v. FlandersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Falender v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.