Legal Opinion
Luberco, Ltd. v. Kipp
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 2, 1949No. Civ. 3957PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is an action to quiet title to two lots in separate blocks, and to two other lots in another block of a subdivision in San Diego. The plaintiff claims under various tax deeds to and from the state, and the defendants claim to be record owners of the property.
The complaint, in the usual form, was filed on January 28, 1947, and alleged that the plaintiff is the owner in fee and entitled to the possession of these lots. The answer, in addition to a general denial, alleged that the defendants are the owners in fee. There was no allegation with respect to possession by the defendants and no…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Meigs v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Dunkum v. MacEck Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Tannhauser v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- City of Compton v. BolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Chambers v. DuvallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McCaslin v. HamblenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Wilson v. KippCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Central Valley Equipment Co. v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1950