Bateman v. . Brooks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClakkson, J.
The defendant at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence made motions for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below overruled these motions and in this we can see no error.
We think the evidence of plaintiff was sufficient to be submitted to a jury and fully warranted the verdict and judgment. The action is for actionable negligence. We think the evidence supports fully the allegations in the complaint. The defendant denied negligence and set up the plea of contributory negligence. The plaintiff was an employee, a brakeman for the defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Britt v. Carolina Northern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Pigford v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Moore v. . RawlsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Robinson v. J. B. Ivey & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hunt v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Lambert v. . CaronnaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Wolfe v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Hunt ex rel. Hunt v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Tate v. . Mirror Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914