Legal Opinion

Moore v. . Rawls

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogdeN, J.

Is it the duty of logging roads or tramroads to equip log ears and engines with automatic couplers?

The defendant, Rawls, was an independent contractor, and as such employed the plaintiff as a laborer. Under the contract existing between the independent contractor and the defendant, Goldsboro Lumber Company, it was the duty of the contractor to cut and load logs on the cars of his codefendant. There is no evidence tending to show that the defendant, Goldsboro Lumber Company, had charge or supervision of the employees of the contractor or of the method of performing the work. It did, however,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. Roanoke Railroad & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Hemphill v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Craft v. Albemarle Timber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Greenlee v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. Cheek v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Petty v. Cranston Print Works CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Padilla v. Gulf Power Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Bateman v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Buchanan v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API