Legal Opinion

Tate v. . Mirror Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Action to recover damages for injuries caused by the negligence of defendant. The plaintiff alleged and offered evidence tending to prove the following case, the truth of which must be assumed, as the jury answered the issues in his favor: He was employed by the defendant as an operator of a glass smoothing stone, run by a quarter-turn belt from a pulley on the spindle, upon the top of which the stone (275) was attached to a pulley on the main-line shaft, which was some 20 inches from the floor and 8 or 10 feet from the stone, the motive power being electricity, the stone at which plaintiff…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Marks v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Hinshaw v. Raleigh & Augusta Air Line R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. Tanner v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. KalkmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API