Legal Opinion
Pyramid Co. v. Mautner
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Alfred J. Weiner, J.
Plaintiff’s complaint consists of four causes of action. The *460first three allege a violation of the Donnelly Act, New York State’s antitrust statute (General Business. Law § 340 et seq.) and the fourth cause of action alleges intentional interference with prospective business advantage. All defendants seek dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint as a matter of law, for failure to state a cause of action.
Plaintiff alleges defendant, Corporate Property Investors (CPI), owner and operator of the Nanuet Mall, a regional shopping mall located in close proximity to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. Mobil Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Sharma v. Skaarup Ship Management Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- International Television Productions Ltd. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Television Division of Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Benjamin of Forest Hills Realty, Inc. v. Austin Sheppard Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Catskill Development, L.L.C. v. Park Place Entertainment Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. Eastern Middlesex Ass'n of Realtors, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994