Legal Opinion

Kristi Koschkee v. Tony Evers

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2018No. 2017AP002278-OAPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1 This original action is before the court for the determination of preliminary motions related to two issues: (1) whether the respondents in this action, Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Evers and the Department of Public Instruction, are entitled to counsel of their choice or whether they must be represented by the Department of Justice; and (2) whether Governor Scott Walker is a necessary party to this action.

¶ 2 We conclude that Evers and the Department of Public Instruction are entitled to counsel of their choice and are not required to be represented by the Department of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  3. In Re Hon. Charles E. KadingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. JenningsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. Jerrell C.J.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. John Doe 1 v. Madison Metro School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State v. James Timothy GenousWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. Dennis L. SchwindWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. Nhia LeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Karen Elizabeth Morway v. David Seth MorwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API