Legal Opinion

Buffalo Branch, Mutual Film Corp. v. Breitinger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 3, 1915No. Appeals, Nos. 45, 46 and 47PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeals, Nos. 45, 46 and 47, January T., 1915, by plaintiffs, from decrees of C. P. No. 5, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1914, Nos. 629, 630 and 631, refusing an injunction, in cases of Buffalo Branch, Mutual Film Corporation; and Mutual Film Corporation of Pennsylvania and Interstate Films Company v, J. Louis Breitinger, chief censor, and E. C. Niver, assistant censor, constituting the State Board of Censors; and Albert E. Brown, William Sachsenmaier, and Vernon R. Carrick,…

Read the full summary

Appeals, Nos. 45, 46 and 47, January T., 1915, by plaintiffs, from decrees of C. P. No. 5, Philadelphia Co., June T., 1914, Nos. 629, 630 and 631, refusing an injunction, in cases of Buffalo Branch, Mutual Film Corporation; and Mutual Film Corporation of Pennsylvania and Interstate Films Company v, J. Louis Breitinger, chief censor, and E. C. Niver, assistant censor, constituting the State Board of Censors; and Albert E. Brown, William Sachsenmaier, and Vernon R. Carrick, trading as the Overbfook Theatre, v. J. Louis Breitinger, chief censor, and E. C. Niver, assistant censor, constituting…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

These are three separate bills in equity brought by the Buffalo Branch, Mutual Film Corporation; Mutual Film Corporation of Pennsylvania and Interstate Films Company; and the Overbrook Theatre, respectively, against J. Louis Breitinger, chief censor, and E. C. Niver, assistant censor, constituting the State Board of Censors. The bills aver that for the reasons therein set forth the Act of June 19,1911, P. L. 1067, regulating the exhibiting or using of moving-pictures and stereopticon views, offends both the federal and State Constitutions, and pray that the act be declared…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Mutual Film Corporation of Missouri v. George H. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Harris v. State Board of Optometrical ExaminersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Commonwealth v. PuderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Gima v. Hudson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Commonwealth v. WidovichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API