Legal Opinion

Coy v. Ford Motor Credit Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1993No. 96PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

In this case, we are asked to determine whether proper notice can be given under the provisions of 69 P.S. § 623 D and under 13 Pa.C.S. § 9504(c), where the party claiming to have given notice provides no receipt of delivery. We conclude that a receipt of delivery is not required in order to effect notice under these statutes.

Here, Ford Motor Credit Company (Ford) appeals from an order denying summary judgment in favor of Ford, and granting summary judgment in favor of Leonard G. Coy. The trial court also awarded statutory damages, under 13 Pa.C.S. § 9507(a), in the amount of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Banker v. Valley Forge InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Briggs v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. American Express Co. v. BurgisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Ford Motor Credit Company v. James P. SolwayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Industrial Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. NashSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chisolm v. TranSouth Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
  2. Pavex, Inc. v. York Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Caterpillar Financial Services v. Get Er DoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. In re Petition to Release Adoption Records Pursuant to 23 Pa.C.S. 2905Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Caterpillar Financial Services v. Get Er DoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API